Naturally, we all have particular reading tastes and one
can hardly be expected to enjoy all genres or subjects, but sometimes I feel as
if I’m in a reading rut. Ten mystery
novels in a row? Five books on natural
history? Perhaps it is time to branch
out, to be more catholic in my reading choices.
I try this every few years by making scouting forays into
those sections of the bookstore where I rarely venture . This year I decided to find just one book
from each row of the “general” fiction area at my favorite local independent
bookstore, Third Place Books. It was tough
going. Even though each row contained around 5,000 books, it was a struggle to find
one book that I wanted to read.
One book I found was a sheer delight, though: A Guide
to the Birds of East Africa (yes, it’s a novel) by Nicolas Drayson, so I
felt encouraged to persevere. I found The Elegance of the Hedgehog (Muriel
Barbery) which was mostly fun, though flawed, and I found The Selected Works of T.S. Spivet (Reif Larsen) which was even more
fun (and less flawed). Still, it took me many hours to sift through
those thousands of books to find those few, and though I enjoyed them, when I
was finished with them I must admit that all I wanted to do was read another
mystery novel.
I’d say that about 80% of my fiction reading is
mysteries, and 20% middle-grade children’s novels. I did read a lot of sci-fi/fantasy from my
teens through my early 30s, but have since lost interest in that genre (with
rare exceptions). I also plowed through
a lot of “classic” literature in college days – Homer, the Greek playwrights,
the Roman satirists, Shakespeare, Swift,
Defoe, Austen, the Brontes, Dickens, Eliot (George),Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Flaubert,
Mann, Faulkner, Fitzgerald, Hemingway, Steinbeck, Joyce, Camus, and so on and so forth and there isn’t a lot
left there unread of great interest.
Mysteries, though – I’ve read them since I was a wee
lass, starting with Nancy Drew, the Hardy boys, Trixie Belden. By age 11 or so, I moved up to adult mysteries
of the “classic puzzle” type (Ellery Queen, Agatha Christie). In college I had a penchant for both U.S. and
U.K. police procedurals, and after 10 or so years of that, swung to amateur
sleuths in mostly non-urban settings with a light touch. All of the other fiction genres I’ve read
have come and gone but mysteries stay the course. I never grow tired of detectives solving
crimes, and of enjoying the ride as they do so.
Over the decades, I’ve read quite widely, and found what
I like, so feeling as if I’m in a reading rut is probably just plain
silly. Perhaps I shouldn’t think of
reading endless mystery novels as being stuck in a rut. Maybe it’s better to
think: A rut is simply a well-worn track, made deep by many journeys because
it is the best possible route to take.
I'm definitely in a rut too. I'd have to say that 95% of what I read are biographies or true crime. I do love a good mystery and I just got a ton of them at the Kennewick Library sale so maybe I will need to leave my rut for awhile. Even the two baseball books I read recently were biographies - Roberto Clemente and Mariano Rivera. Speaking of baseball - GAK! My team definitely needs a break.
ReplyDeleteAnyway - ruts are good. If you like it do it.
I guess what I should have said was - My team needs to get out of its rut! LOL. Hope the guys can actually give Felix some run support and turn things around. Sheesh.
ReplyDelete